Simple Chilean guys from Ace Team once declared themselves and their passion for various substances by releasing a unique and inimitable in many aspects Zeno Clash. Then it was successful Rock of Ages, and it was followed by a very controversial sequel to the debut. Whose footsteps did you follow? Abyss Odyssey and what to expect from it – watch it right now.

Abyss Odyssey

Best comments

I don’t understand anything, I also bought the game and I don’t regret it, wonderful picture, great music, style, combat is not the best, but it was very easy to get used to, even for me playing on a keyboard mouse, what’s also interesting is that each playthrough turns out at least a little different, I didn’t experience any problems with jumping, you just can’t play this game trying to run through everything quickly, everything is done slowly in it, the hits are jumping, as for me it’s very similar to DARK SOULS, where you can’t quickly run through the entire game while swinging your sword in all directions, I can also say that the style of playing for different Persians is very different, at least for the first two, since I didn’t open the third because it’s not easy, and as for Fen’s words that they don’t explain anything to us, then you’ll excuse me, but you yourself always complain that all modern games lead the player by the hand, chewing everything and putting it in his mouth,and here the situation is again similar to DARK SOULS, we are thrown into the world and told, “Run here, jump here, hit here, then learn for yourself, experiment, find out,” is that bad?? Also, one of the features that Fen forgot to mention, as far as I know, the developers will change the main boss over time, that is, as soon as the mask on the pedestal is full (screen below), this will mean that the players have killed the main boss a certain number of times and he will be replaced by another, perhaps ordinary enemies will also change, I don’t know for sure. The game definitely doesn’t deserve a rubbish rating, at a minimum the rating should have been passable, that is, it’s not for everyone. www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzeDek2T-zs

After Vanya’s monologue about “Slow Combat”, and against the backdrop of footage where the character does a good job of quickly dealing with enemies.I have some dissonance here.

Well, about “Garbage”, it’s a little too harsh.

The player learned about most of his gameplay capabilities immediately, and then, with their support, rushed to explore the world.

The only thing the player learned right away was how to walk, hit and sit by the fire, I think everyone who actually played DS will understand me. I’m saying one thing, the game is far from trash, in the review itself, the only minuses I heard was that you couldn’t handle the controls, didn’t understand how to open a third character and how to set a checkpoint, all from this we can conclude that the game is trash, but it’s available on Steam shit bad games and worse, there are a lot of games that were transferred from phones and sold on Steam at exorbitant prices, but here it is clear that the developers paid a lot of time and attention to the game and do not forget that the game has not been abandoned, it will still be patched and some errors will probably be corrected. But of course, I realized a long time ago that it is useless to argue with editors on SG because they are always right in any case, and those who contradict them are simply bombarded with minuses, so yes, I said what I thought, I don’t want to convince anyone anymore, I like the game and I will play it. I still think that something needs to be done with the rating system on SG, and judging by the increased number of disputes and people disagreeing with the editors, under almost every new review, I’m not the only one who thinks so

You can go through “Prohodnyak” once, get some pleasure and then calmly forget about it. And I don’t recommend anyone to play this at all.

This is exactly what is the cornerstone of all SG reviews? why do you give games ratings if this is just your personal opinion, why tell people that the game is garbage and absolutely not worthy of any attention? Why can’t you just make a review, summarize all the pros and cons at the end and say a simple phrase “Well, whether to play this game or not, let everyone decide for themselves” and that’s it. Just imagine if Kostya had to write a review of MGS and he gives the game a rubbish rating, simply because he doesn’t like Japanese stuff, all kinds of anime and chicken-like robots, and you, as an ordinary user, just went to SG to read a review of your favorite game, wouldn’t you easily agree with such a review?? I doubt it very much. Yes, also in the review one of the significant features of the game was not mentioned, after the GG collects the maximum amount of mana, he can take control of any enemy, be it a regular enemy or some kind of mini boss, then we can turn into the one we captured and use his fighting style and special. techniques, which also significantly diversify the game. For those who think that I am defending the game only because I spent money on it, I want to upset you, because after the game came out, I looked at the review on YouTube, and then pirated it, yes, exactly like that, since I still doubted precisely because of the controls whether I could cope with it, and after one day of playing on a pirate, I decided in the evening that the game was suitable for me and bought it on Steam.

This is exactly what is the cornerstone nonukcasinosites.co.uk/fast-withdrawal-betting-sites/ of all SG reviews? why do you give games ratings if this is just your personal opinion, why tell people that the game is garbage and absolutely not worthy of any attention?

Guys, do you even understand what you are asking for?. This is not a machine or a review generator. Any gamer is first and foremost a person. Gamer. With your own understanding of how the game should or should not look and play. Of course, he relies on his own gaming experience, tastes, impressions. And of course, his gaming assessment will not necessarily coincide with yours.

Ever since the authors and editors of the Stopgame website, led by Maxim Kulakov, decided and began to openly declare that all the ratings given to the games they review are just their opinion, my fart cooled down and no longer ignited, since there is no reason for it. Moreover, the same people have repeatedly stated that they are not professional gamers, but a creative team, and their opinion can and will differ from the opinion of site users. And in order to show the difference or similarity between the opinions of the editors and authors of SG and the opinions of visitors, they introduced (or maybe it was there initially, I don’t remember) a user rating for the game being reviewed.
The fact that Vanya rated it “Trash” means that the game to him didn’t like it. Disputes about what he wrong I rated it, they don’t make any sense (well, except for the sake of a little bitch in the comments to interest visitors who are ignorant of the topic).
Regarding the review itself, I agree with those people who rate this game as “Prohodnyak” or higher. And as confirmation that there are enough such people, I’m adding a link to the Metacritic website page dedicated to this game.
www.metacritic.com/game/pc/abyss-odyssey

I disagreed and expressed my position. I don’t understand your outrage about this.

Let’s go in order. Firstly, no one takes away my right to an opinion, that’s why I use it. Not just like that, but in contrast to Fen’s opinion. You see, I wouldn’t want the SG audience to have the wrong understanding about the game, and the review presents it in a negative way. Completely negative, a passing remark about a beautiful picture does not count. And I share Denjavor’s bewilderment about this. “Average” games, as you say, regularly receive a “pass” or higher. Consider my comment an alternative opinion that allows you to more fully evaluate the picture.

Secondly. Okay, you decided for yourself that you won’t play it, but you’re giving advice to people who must decide for themselves whether to take the game or not. What is it all about?? Why does a character walk past a lying sword and not take it with him?? What types of rooms are there in the game, how to gain control of an enemy creature, why a soldier appears and how to bring the hero back, co-op, etc.d – nothing was said about this! Spending half the video worrying about unresponsive controls, disliked combat and non-obvious moments is at least unprofessional. The theme of the game has not been revealed.

Hmm… I’ve thoroughly decided that the game is worth giving a chance, because such entertaining holivars don’t arise out of nowhere oO

So on top of everything else, at that moment the hero was also running with a two-handed sword 🙂 Catherine, the original character, waves her sword even faster.

I bought it, played a little… The game is crooked. The combat is angular, crooked, the game is buggy… I don’t recommend buying = (

Do you want beautiful locations?? Play Dust an Elysian tail, it’s better and the combat system is also better, almost everything is better there.

Well, personally, I always try to form my own opinion 🙂 I’m used to living like this.
Based on the review of this game, I will say this: I really respect Vanya Loev. Both as a professional and as a person. I like his approach to reviews and reviews, but I have long noticed that his criteria for evaluating games do not always coincide with mine. And that’s okay. Therefore, if a game interests me, then I do not rely on the assessment of only one reviewer, no matter how professional he may be.

You shouldn’t be like that. The combat is not DMC, of ​​course, but quite digestible. If you skillfully alternate with special attacks, the heroine will scatter the crowd quite well alone, and in general she will be less likely to fly across the screen from enemy kicks. The same goes for support characters, about whom nothing was said at all, just like the methods for obtaining them. Jackal or Bauta are capable of demonstrating such close combat that you can either stand or fall.

As for me, the phrase from your video perfectly characterizes the current situation – “in another time, I would have walked past this game calmly”. It’s not your game, that’s all. Is it any wonder that the subsequent claims?

The third character of Pancoya, by the way, opens up in the most elementary way. 25-30K of money is earned in 2 playthroughs, you only need to make your way through the treasury, since its chests contain about 10K of money. Plus general savings from the dungeon.

Nothing is said about multiplayer and co-op either, but oh well, they’re in the game for show.

The obvious conclusion when looking at the review is that Vanya played for an hour, stumbled on the controls and combat, didn’t even master the final boss, and left it like that in order to get rid of it quickly. And if it weren’t for Ghost Monk’s level 18, that’s exactly what I would have decided.
For myself, I defined Abyss Odyssey as an intermediate stage between “Prokhodnyak” and “Commendable”, not least because of its replayability. On the one hand, it takes an hour, on the other hand, it seems like you can run through it a few more times if you have nothing to do, mashing the buttons on the gamepad. Against the backdrop of the “Garbage” already seen at SG, AO looks quite good.